Hits: 408 img
In specialty sealing and protective applications, a single material often struggles to meet multiple stringent requirements simultaneously. Traditional nitrile rubber offers good oil resistance but has a limited upper temperature tolerance. Conventional silicone rubber provides a wide temperature range but is prone to swelling in fuels and chemical media. The emergence of fluorosilicone rubber (F‑LSR) offers a viable material solution for applications that demand both oil resistance and low‑temperature performance.
The performance characteristics of F‑LSR stem from its specially designed molecular structure. Based on a siloxane backbone, fluorine‑containing groups are introduced onto the side chains. This structure not only preserves the temperature resistance and elasticity of silicone rubber but also endows the material with the ability to resist attack by hydrocarbon media. Fluorine content is a key variable affecting oil resistance. Common products have fluorine content ranging from 20 % to 35 %, resulting in significantly lower volume swell in ASTM standard oils (such as IRM 903) compared to ordinary silicone rubber. At the same time, the low‑temperature brittleness point of F‑LSR can reach approximately ‑60 °C, meaning it can maintain necessary elastic recovery in cold climates or high‑altitude environments.
From an application distribution perspective, F‑LSR is suitable for highly targeted scenarios. Seals in aircraft fuel systems must resist both the chemical attack of jet fuel and alternating extreme temperatures. Automotive high‑pressure common rail fuel lines operate under high‑pressure pulsation conditions, imposing strict requirements on the oil resistance and fatigue resistance of sealing materials. Valve linings and pipeline seals in the chemical industry face exposure to various corrosive media. In emerging hydrogen energy systems, F‑LSR is also demonstrating potential in sealing applications.
Processing F‑LSR involves some technical differences compared to conventional liquid silicone rubber. Due to the presence of fluorine‑containing components, the curing temperature window and mold cleanliness requirements are more stringent. Residual sulfides or contaminants may affect the surface quality of finished parts. When bonding to metal inserts, dedicated primers are required to ensure long‑term stability of the adhesive interface. For production lines using two‑component pumping systems, special care should be taken to prevent cross‑contamination between different raw material systems to avoid cure inhibition caused by catalyst poisoning.
For service conditions that demand combined resistance to chemical media and temperature extremes, F‑LSR provides a technical option that balances sealing reliability with environmental adaptability. Proper material selection and standardized processing procedures are prerequisites for realizing its performance advantages.
More information, please click here.